<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cplusplus.co.il &#187; stl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cplusplus.co.il/category/cpp/stl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cplusplus.co.il</link>
	<description>Discussing modern C++ and related topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='cplusplus.co.il' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://cplusplus.co.il/osd.xml" title="cplusplus.co.il" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cplusplus.co.il/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Tuples</title>
		<link>http://cplusplus.co.il/2010/01/15/tuples/</link>
		<comments>http://cplusplus.co.il/2010/01/15/tuples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rmn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tr1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cplusplus.co.il/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the containers introduced within TR1 (which is already widely available &#8211; both in gcc and Visual Studio) is a Tuple type, which is adopted from The Boost Tuple Library. Tuple types are very convenient at times; For example, it is possible to return multipe values from a function through a tuple, or write [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cplusplus.co.il&amp;blog=8968104&amp;post=731&amp;subd=cpptalk&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cplusplus.co.il/2010/01/15/tuples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/4ceb7c3e96e1e6c9fbef377af219fc0a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">rmn</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do cin and cout have conversion to a void* and not bool?</title>
		<link>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/10/11/why-do-cin-and-cout-have-conversion-to-void-and-not-bool/</link>
		<comments>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/10/11/why-do-cin-and-cout-have-conversion-to-void-and-not-bool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rmn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[stl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpptalk.wordpress.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both std::cin and std::cout provide a conversion to a void* type, but not to a boolean: What use does a conversion to a boolean have, and which pitfalls does the current implementation save us from? First off, a conversion to a boolean type is useful for the following construct: But why is it a conversion to a void* and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cplusplus.co.il&amp;blog=8968104&amp;post=348&amp;subd=cpptalk&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/10/11/why-do-cin-and-cout-have-conversion-to-void-and-not-bool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/4ceb7c3e96e1e6c9fbef377af219fc0a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">rmn</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different ways to iterate over a vector</title>
		<link>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/08/28/different-ways-to-iterate-over-a-vector/</link>
		<comments>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/08/28/different-ways-to-iterate-over-a-vector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rmn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[stl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpptalk.wordpress.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iterating over a vector is a pretty simple task we get to do pretty often. It can be achieved in quite a few ways: Using normal random access (operator[] with index). Using std::iterator. Using std::for_each algorithm. I set out to check the runtime differences between all these options, and the results turned out to be a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cplusplus.co.il&amp;blog=8968104&amp;post=72&amp;subd=cpptalk&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/08/28/different-ways-to-iterate-over-a-vector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/4ceb7c3e96e1e6c9fbef377af219fc0a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">rmn</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
